From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Streeter v. Bridge, Inc.

United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division
Mar 16, 2006
Civil Action No. 2:04CV418-W (WO) (M.D. Ala. Mar. 16, 2006)

Summary

holding that not being provided a computer quickly and not being able to access certain paper files were not adverse employment actions

Summary of this case from Lamont v. City of Albany

Opinion

Civil Action No. 2:04CV418-W (WO).

March 16, 2006


JUDGMENT


In accordance with the order entered on this date granting defendant's motion for summary judgment, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of this court that plaintiff's claims against defendant are DISMISSED with prejudice. Costs are taxed against plaintiff.


Summaries of

Streeter v. Bridge, Inc.

United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division
Mar 16, 2006
Civil Action No. 2:04CV418-W (WO) (M.D. Ala. Mar. 16, 2006)

holding that not being provided a computer quickly and not being able to access certain paper files were not adverse employment actions

Summary of this case from Lamont v. City of Albany
Case details for

Streeter v. Bridge, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:BARBARA STREETER, Plaintiff, v. THE BRIDGE, INC., Defendant

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division

Date published: Mar 16, 2006

Citations

Civil Action No. 2:04CV418-W (WO) (M.D. Ala. Mar. 16, 2006)

Citing Cases

Lamont v. City of Albany

Little v. Peach Cnty. Sch. Dist., at 2009 WL 198003 *11 (M.D. Ga. 2009). Likewise, the Court finds that the…