From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Strayer v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jul 10, 1996
676 So. 2d 77 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

Summary

In Strayer, we issued a two-paragraph opinion reversing the summary denial of a rule 3.800(a) motion alleging both that an order of restitution was illegal because it was imposed more than sixty days after sentencing and that the defendant did not receive notice of and an opportunity to defend at the restitution hearing.

Summary of this case from Heare v. State

Opinion

No. 96-00642.

July 10, 1996.

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(g) from the Circuit Court for Hardee County; J. Dale Durrance, Judge.


John Richard Strayer appeals the summary denial of his motion to correct his sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). Strayer claims that the order of restitution entered pursuant to a June 6, 1995, hearing is illegal because it was imposed more than sixty days after the sentencing, which he alleges occurred on January 29, 1992. He also states that he was not given adequate notice of the hearing and an opportunity to defend. Strayer's allegations, if true, may entitle him to relief. See State v. Sanderson, 625 So.2d 471 (Fla. 1993); State v. Hiscox, 677 So.2d 862 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996).

The trial court summarily denied the motion without attachments from the record that conclusively refute Strayer's allegations. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for further proceedings consistent herewith. On remand, should the trial court again deny the motion, it must attach portions of the record conclusively showing that appellant is entitled to no relief.

Reversed and remanded.

RYDER, A.C.J., and FRANK and LAZZARA, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Strayer v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jul 10, 1996
676 So. 2d 77 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

In Strayer, we issued a two-paragraph opinion reversing the summary denial of a rule 3.800(a) motion alleging both that an order of restitution was illegal because it was imposed more than sixty days after sentencing and that the defendant did not receive notice of and an opportunity to defend at the restitution hearing.

Summary of this case from Heare v. State

stating that a prisoner may collaterally attack a restitution order that was entered while the trial court lacked jurisdiction

Summary of this case from Butler v. State

stating that a prisoner may collaterally attack a restitution order that was entered while the trial court lacked jurisdiction

Summary of this case from Butler v. State
Case details for

Strayer v. State

Case Details

Full title:JOHN STRAYER, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Jul 10, 1996

Citations

676 So. 2d 77 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

Citing Cases

Heare v. State

Accordingly, we affirm the postconviction court's order to the extent it summarily denied relief under rule…

Butler v. State

Therefore, our affirmance is without prejudice to any right Butler may have to collaterally attack the…