From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Strauss v. United States Lines Co.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
May 25, 1943
180 Misc. 664 (N.Y. App. Term 1943)

Opinion

May 25, 1943.

Appeal from the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of Manhattan, MARKS, J.

John F.X. McKiernan for appellant.

Alfred Feingold for respondent.



Defendant's obligation was to refund reichsmarks and entitled plaintiff to a judgment in dollars measured by the rate of exchange prevailing at the place and date of demand of refund. ( Hoppe v. Russo-Asiatic Bank, 235 N.Y. 37, 39.) Forty cents per reichsmark represents the official rate of exchange adopted in transactions controlled by the German Government at the time reichsmarks were paid to defendant and is not representative of the value of reichsmarks in foreign exchange.

Judgment reversed, and judgment directed in favor of plaintiff, the amount to be assessed accordingly in the court below.

HAMMER, SHIENTAG and HECHT, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Strauss v. United States Lines Co.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
May 25, 1943
180 Misc. 664 (N.Y. App. Term 1943)
Case details for

Strauss v. United States Lines Co.

Case Details

Full title:GERTRUD STRAUSS, Respondent, v. UNITED STATES LINES COMPANY, Appellant

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: May 25, 1943

Citations

180 Misc. 664 (N.Y. App. Term 1943)
42 N.Y.S.2d 618

Citing Cases

Hughes Tool Co. v. United Artists Corp.

          In the Landau case the court said (p. 15): 'This finding is based largely upon the uncontradicted…