From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Strauss v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO
May 18, 1999
998 S.W.2d 43 (Mo. Ct. App. 1999)

Opinion

No. ED73498

OPINION FILED: May 18, 1999 Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied July 27, 1999. Application for Transfer Denied September 21, 1999.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. LOUIS COUNTY, HONORABLE JOHN F. KINTZ, JUDGE.

Dave Hemingway, Asst. Sp. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Karen L. Kramer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before James R. Dowd, P.J., Lawrence G. Crahan, J., and Richard B. Teitelman, J.


ORDER


Movant Timothy Strauss was convicted of one count of felony stealing, Section 570.030, RSMo 1994, and filed a motion to vacate judgment and sentence under Rule 29.15. Movant now appeals from the judgment denying his motion without an evidentiary hearing.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the motion court's determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). No precedential or jurisprudential purpose would be served by an extended opinion reciting detailed facts and restating principles of law. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Strauss v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO
May 18, 1999
998 S.W.2d 43 (Mo. Ct. App. 1999)
Case details for

Strauss v. State

Case Details

Full title:TIMOTHY STRAUSS, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF MISSOURI, RESPONDENT

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO

Date published: May 18, 1999

Citations

998 S.W.2d 43 (Mo. Ct. App. 1999)