Because a judgment denying a motion for summary judgment is interlocutory in nature, it cannot be certified as immediately appealable under La. C.C.P. art. 1915(B). Id.;Granger v. Guillory, 00–363, pp. 1–2 (La.App. 3 Cir. 4/26/00), 762 So.2d 640, 641; Strain v. Williams, 01–2157 (La.App. 1 Cir. 9/27/02), 835 So.2d 618, 620, n. 2. Accordingly, the trial court's certification that its denial of Marrero Land's motion for summary judgment is a final and appealable judgment is without effect.
Kim's action of driving her supervisor to a mechanic's shop to check on his company-owned vehicle during her normal work hours at her supervisor's request, which request was made prior to his closing the store for the day and on the premises of the Quiznos store, could reasonably be perceived as serving or benefiting Quizco. See Richard v. Hall. 03-1488 at 6-7, 874 So. 2d at 138; see also Strain v. Williams, 01-2157 (La.App. 1st Cir. 9/27/02), 835 So. 2d 618. To reach any other conclusion, the trial court and the majority herein must impermissibly weigh the evidence to conclude that Kim was not in the course and scope of her employment at the time the accident occurred.