From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Strain v. Sandham

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 26, 2009
2:05-cv-0474-GEB-GGH-P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 26, 2009)

Opinion

2:05-cv-0474-GEB-GGH-P.

February 26, 2009


ORDER


Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On January 23, 2009, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Defendants have filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed January 23, 2009 are adopted in full; and

2. Defendants' motion for summary judgment, filed on May 2, 2008 (Docket #111), is denied.


Summaries of

Strain v. Sandham

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 26, 2009
2:05-cv-0474-GEB-GGH-P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 26, 2009)
Case details for

Strain v. Sandham

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES STRAIN, Plaintiff, v. R. SANDHAM, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 26, 2009

Citations

2:05-cv-0474-GEB-GGH-P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 26, 2009)

Citing Cases

Santana v. State

The fact that Plaintiff received as much medical attention as he did does not, alone, preclude him from…