From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Straehler v. Brownell

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
Jun 13, 1957
246 F.2d 675 (D.C. Cir. 1957)

Opinion

No. 13605.

Argued May 15, 1957.

Decided June 13, 1957.

Mr. George Eric Rosden, Washington, D.C., for appellant.

Mr. Irwin A. Seibel, Atty., Dept. of Justice, with whom Mr. George B. Searls and Miss Marbeth A. Miller, Attys., Dept. of Justice, were on the brief, for appellee.

Before EDGERTON, Chief Judge, and PRETTYMAN and FAHY, Circuit Judges.


This is an action under § 34(e) of the Trading with the Enemy Act, 40 Stat. 411, as amended, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 34(e), to review the Attorney General's partial disallowance of a debt claim asserted against property vested under the Act. The plaintiff appeals from a summary judgment for the defendant. We find no error affecting substantial rights.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Straehler v. Brownell

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
Jun 13, 1957
246 F.2d 675 (D.C. Cir. 1957)
Case details for

Straehler v. Brownell

Case Details

Full title:Otto STRAEHLER, Appellant, v. Herbert BROWNELL, Jr., Attorney General of…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit

Date published: Jun 13, 1957

Citations

246 F.2d 675 (D.C. Cir. 1957)
100 U.S. App. D.C. 394

Citing Cases

Reissner v. Rogers

And we have applied this so-called "judgment day rule" in converting into dollars a foreign currency claim…

Masami Sasaki v. Rogers

Therefore, under Rule 56(c), 28 U.S.C.A., there being no genuine issue of material fact, the moving party…