From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Straatmann v. Holland

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Aug 31, 2004
142 S.W.3d 212 (Mo. Ct. App. 2004)

Opinion

No. ED 83534.

August 31, 2004.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Franklin County; Walter A. Murray, Jr., Judge.

Christopher W. Jensen, Union, MO, for appellant.

Edward A. Stierberger, Timothy J. Melenbrink, Union, MO, Donald K. Althauser, Hermann, MO, for respondents.

Fran Sahm, Villa Ridge, MO, pro se.

Maurice Straatmann, Villa Ridge, MO, pro se.

Luella Brinker, New Haven, MO, pro se.

Charlene Rott, Kokomo, IN, pro se.

Jane C. Brueggemann, Washington, MO, pro se.

Carol M. Hellman, Washington, MO, pro se.

Before LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, P.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, and MARY K. HOFF, JJ.


ORDER


The petitioner, Edward C. Straatmann, appeals from the judgment of the trial court denying his claim for specific performance of an alleged real estate sales contract. The judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears and a written opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Straatmann v. Holland

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Aug 31, 2004
142 S.W.3d 212 (Mo. Ct. App. 2004)
Case details for

Straatmann v. Holland

Case Details

Full title:Edward C. STRAATMANN, Petitioner/Appellant, v. Janice HOLLAND, Laverne…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District

Date published: Aug 31, 2004

Citations

142 S.W.3d 212 (Mo. Ct. App. 2004)