From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stout v. Remetronix, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Apr 30, 2014
Case No.: 3:13-CV-26 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 30, 2014)

Opinion

Case No.: 3:13-CV-26

04-30-2014

GARY K. STOUT for himself and others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. REMETRONIX, INC., et al., Defendants.


Judge Thomas M. Rose

Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (Doc. 44)

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman (doc. 44), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendation in full. It is therefore ORDERED that:

1. The parties' stipulation of voluntary dismissal without prejudice of opt-in Plaintiffs Williams and Bohorquez pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) (doc. 42) is CONSTRUED as a joint, unopposed motion to dismiss pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 21;
2. The motion is GRANTED; and
3. Opt-in Plaintiffs Williams and Bohorquez are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

________________

Thomas M. Rose

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Stout v. Remetronix, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Apr 30, 2014
Case No.: 3:13-CV-26 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 30, 2014)
Case details for

Stout v. Remetronix, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:GARY K. STOUT for himself and others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

Date published: Apr 30, 2014

Citations

Case No.: 3:13-CV-26 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 30, 2014)