Opinion
22-6280
11-28-2022
Hazel Stoudemire, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. William Henry Davidson, II, DAVIDSON, WREN & DEMASTERS, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
UNPUBLISHED
Submitted: November 22, 2022
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Senior District Judge. (2:21-cv-01230-JFA)
Hazel Stoudemire, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
William Henry Davidson, II, DAVIDSON, WREN & DEMASTERS, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Before HARRIS and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM
Hazel Stoudemire, Jr., appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing without prejudice Stoudemire's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint for failure to exhaust administrative remedies and declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over his state law claims. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. Stoudemire v. Thomas, No. 2:21-cv-01230-JFA (D.S.C. Mar. 1, 2022). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED