From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stoppelmann v. Sargent

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Jun 27, 2006
195 S.W.3d 448 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006)

Opinion

No. ED 87079.

June 27, 2006.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Louis County; Steven H. Goldman, Judge.

James J. Logan, Chesterfield, MO, for appellant.

Mark C. Nelinson, Sunset Hills, MO, for respondent.

Before GLENN A. NORTON, C.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and ROY L. RICHTER, J.


ORDER


Jeffrey M. Stoppelmann appeals from the judgment of the trial court following a jury verdict that awarded him $2,764 in damages for his claims. Stoppelmann contends that the trial court plainly erred in not granting his motion for a new trial in that the jury verdict was shockingly inadequate, the result of confusion and prejudice, and against the weight of the evidence.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Stoppelmann v. Sargent

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Jun 27, 2006
195 S.W.3d 448 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006)
Case details for

Stoppelmann v. Sargent

Case Details

Full title:Jeffrey M. STOPPELMANN, Appellant/Plaintiff, v. Alice SARGENT…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District

Date published: Jun 27, 2006

Citations

195 S.W.3d 448 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006)