From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stonica v. State Farm Fire Casualty Company

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Feb 25, 1991
198 Ga. App. 717 (Ga. Ct. App. 1991)

Opinion

A91A0386.

DECIDED FEBRUARY 25, 1991.

Action on policy. Spalding Superior Court. Before Judge Whalen.

Cramer, Weaver Edwards, Christopher C. Edwards, for appellant.

Beck, Owen Murray, Samuel A. Murray, James R. Fortune, Jr., Long, Weinberg, Ansley Wheeler, Quinton Seay, Alan L. Newman, for appellee.


Stonica sued Elrod for slander. State Farm, which insured Elrod under a homeowner's policy, brought a declaratory judgment action against its insured and Stonica, seeking to establish that the policy provided no coverage for the slander claim. Stonica filed a timely answer to the declaratory judgment action, but Elrod did not. The trial court entered an order granting judgment by default to State Farm against Elrod, and declaring that the policy afforded no coverage on the slander claim. Stonica appeals claiming the default judgment against Elrod operated as an erroneous final judgment against him on the merits of the declaratory judgment action.

Stonica has no standing to bring this appeal because the default judgment does not adversely affect him as a co-defendant. Avis Rent a Car System v. Rice, 132 Ga. App. 857, 858 ( 209 S.E.2d 270) (1974). The default operates as an admission by Elrod of the truth of the factual allegations in State Farm's complaint, and bars her from litigating the merits of the claim. Id. at 858; Fred Chenoweth Equip. Co. v. Oculus Corp., 254 Ga. 321, 323 ( 328 S.E.2d 539) (1985). See also Town of Thunderbolt v. River Crossing Apts., 189 Ga. App. 607, 608-609 ( 377 S.E.2d 12) (1988) (holding that entry of a default judgment pursuant to OCGA § 9-11-55 (a) in a declaratory judgment action was proper). However, the declaratory judgment entered by default against Elrod is not binding against Stonica, nor is it evidence that can be used by State Farm to obtain a judgment against Stonica. Peek v. Southern Guaranty Ins. Co., 240 Ga. 498, 499 ( 241 S.E.2d 210) (1978).

Moreover, this is not a directly appealable final judgment since it adjudicates the rights and liabilities of less than all the parties, and the trial court made no express determination and direction for entry of such judgment pursuant to OCGA § 9-11-54 (b). First Union Nat. Bank v. Cumberland Creek Country Club, 194 Ga. App. 332, 333 ( 390 S.E.2d 422) (1990).

Appeal dismissed. Sognier, C. J., and McMurray, P. J., concur.


DECIDED FEBRUARY 25, 1991.


Summaries of

Stonica v. State Farm Fire Casualty Company

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Feb 25, 1991
198 Ga. App. 717 (Ga. Ct. App. 1991)
Case details for

Stonica v. State Farm Fire Casualty Company

Case Details

Full title:STONICA v. STATE FARM FIRE CASUALTY COMPANY

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Feb 25, 1991

Citations

198 Ga. App. 717 (Ga. Ct. App. 1991)
402 S.E.2d 553

Citing Cases

Hodges v. Grange Mut. Ins. Co.

St. John's Melkite Catholic Church v. Commr. of Revenue, 240 Ga. 733, 734 ( 242 S.E.2d 108) (1978) (appellate…

Cook v. Prudential Property Casualty Insurance

] However, the declaratory judgment entered by default against [the Wyches] is not binding against [the…