From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stoner v. Stoner

Appellate Court of Illinois, Chicago, First District
Sep 11, 1944
323 Ill. App. 654 (Ill. App. Ct. 1944)

Opinion

Gen. No. 43,023. (Abstract of Decision.)

Opinion filed September 11, 1944

LIMITATIONS OF ACTION, § 247sufficiency of evidence to sustain chancellor's finding as to residence of plaintiff in action on promissory notes. In action on series of promissory notes, executed in Ohio but governed by Illinois 10-year statute of limitations, maker of which notes did not come to Illinois for residence purposes until date less than 10 years before action was begun after maturing of last of notes, held that chancellor's finding, to effect that payee of notes was resident of Illinois at time that notes were executed and continuously thereafter, was borne out by evidence (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1943, ch. 83, pars. 17, 19; Jones Ill. Stats. Ann. 107.276, 107.278).

See Callaghan's Illinois Digest, same topic and section number.

Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. JOHN J. LUPE, Judge, presiding.

Decree affirmed. Heard in the first division, first district, this court at the April term, 1944.

Eckhart, Klein, McSwain Campbell, of Chicago, for appellant;

Arnold D. McMahon, of Chicago, of counsel;

Cohon Goldstein, of Chicago, for appellee.


Not to be published in full. Opinion filed September 11, 1944.


Summaries of

Stoner v. Stoner

Appellate Court of Illinois, Chicago, First District
Sep 11, 1944
323 Ill. App. 654 (Ill. App. Ct. 1944)
Case details for

Stoner v. Stoner

Case Details

Full title:Floyd J. Stoner, Appellee, v. Herbert H. Stoner et al., Defendants…

Court:Appellate Court of Illinois, Chicago, First District

Date published: Sep 11, 1944

Citations

323 Ill. App. 654 (Ill. App. Ct. 1944)
56 N.E.2d 476