From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stone v. La. Dep't of Revenue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Oct 1, 2014
CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-2182 SECTION I (E.D. La. Oct. 1, 2014)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-2182 SECTION I

10-01-2014

JOANNE STONE v. LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE


ORDER AND REASONS

Before the Court is a motion to seal this case filed by plaintiff, Joanne Stone. Plaintiff believes that the record of the existence of this lawsuit "is preventing [her] from employment, getting jobs and working." She requests that the Court seal the entire record of this case to prevent these perceived effects and because "[c]onfidential information exists in the files."

R. Doc. No. 6. Plaintiff filed a similar motion to seal a related case. See Stone v. La. Dep't of Revenue, No. 12-3022 (E.D. La. Dec. 20, 2012), R. Doc. No. 47.

R. Doc. No. 6, at 1.

R. Doc. No. 6-1, at 1.

There is "a strong public interest in maintaining accurate records in civil cases" and "in free and open access to court documents." McGough v. Corrections Corp. of Am., No. 1:07-0039, 2008 WL 313064, at *3 (M.D. Tenn. Feb. 1, 2008) (denying motion to expunge defendant's name from civil lawsuit so defendant would not have to disclose existence of lawsuit). Thus, "[t]he Federal Rules of Civil Procedure demonstrate a policy in favor of full record retention." See Alkaabi v. DHS, No. 09-5476, 2010 WL 4668337, at *1 (E.D. La. Nov. 5, 2010) (Fallon, J.) (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 79(a)(1)) (denying motion to expunge records that plaintiff had filed a lawsuit).

Although plaintiff asserts that she is presently experiencing adverse consequences as a result of the continued existence of a record of this lawsuit, under these circumstances the Court does not find that outweighs the general principle that court records should be public, accessible, and unsealed. Nor has plaintiff satisfied Local Rule 5.6 by articulating what specific confidential information should be sealed, or why sealing is necessary or authorized by governing case law. See LR 5.6(B). Accordingly,

The Court expresses no opinion whether plaintiff may pursue some other relief based on her belief that potential employers have declined to hire her because of her prior litigation.
--------

IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff's motion is DENIED.

New Orleans, Louisiana, October 1, 2014.

/s/ _______

LANCE M. AFRICK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Stone v. La. Dep't of Revenue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Oct 1, 2014
CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-2182 SECTION I (E.D. La. Oct. 1, 2014)
Case details for

Stone v. La. Dep't of Revenue

Case Details

Full title:JOANNE STONE v. LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Date published: Oct 1, 2014

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-2182 SECTION I (E.D. La. Oct. 1, 2014)