From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stone v. Jesson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Jan 9, 2020
Case No. 11-cv-0951 (WMW/HB) (D. Minn. Jan. 9, 2020)

Opinion

Case No. 11-cv-0951 (WMW/HB)

01-09-2020

Charles Richard Stone, Plaintiff, v. Lucinda E. Jesson et al., Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This matter is before the Court on the December 3, 2019 Report and Recommendation (R&R) of United States Magistrate Judge Hildy Bowbeer. (Dkt. 201.) Because no objections were filed within the time period permitted, this Court reviews the R&R for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Having reviewed the R&R, the Court finds no clear error.

Based on the R&R, the foregoing analysis, and all the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

1. The December 3, 2019 R&R, (Dkt. 201), is ADOPTED.

2. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, (Dkt. 145), is GRANTED.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. Dated: January 9, 2020

s/Wilhelmina M. Wright

Wilhelmina M. Wright

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Stone v. Jesson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Jan 9, 2020
Case No. 11-cv-0951 (WMW/HB) (D. Minn. Jan. 9, 2020)
Case details for

Stone v. Jesson

Case Details

Full title:Charles Richard Stone, Plaintiff, v. Lucinda E. Jesson et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Date published: Jan 9, 2020

Citations

Case No. 11-cv-0951 (WMW/HB) (D. Minn. Jan. 9, 2020)