From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stone v. Davis

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Jun 15, 2020
Case No. 20-cv-0669 (WMW/BRT) (D. Minn. Jun. 15, 2020)

Opinion

Case No. 20-cv-0669 (WMW/BRT)

06-15-2020

Patrick Stone, Plaintiff, v. Andrew Davis, J. Matthew Linstroth, and Katz & Stefani, LLC, Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This matter is before the Court on the May 12, 2020 Report and Recommendation (R&R) of United States Magistrate Judge Becky R. Thorson. (Dkt. 30.) No objections to the R&R have been filed. In the absence of timely objections, this Court reviews an R&R for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Having reviewed the R&R, the Court finds no clear error.

ORDER

Based on the R&R, all the files, record, and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

1. The May 12, 2020 R&R, (Dkt. 30), is ADOPTED.

2. This matter is TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a). Dated: June 15, 2020

s/Wilhelmina M. Wright

Wilhelmina M. Wright

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Stone v. Davis

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Jun 15, 2020
Case No. 20-cv-0669 (WMW/BRT) (D. Minn. Jun. 15, 2020)
Case details for

Stone v. Davis

Case Details

Full title:Patrick Stone, Plaintiff, v. Andrew Davis, J. Matthew Linstroth, and Katz…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Date published: Jun 15, 2020

Citations

Case No. 20-cv-0669 (WMW/BRT) (D. Minn. Jun. 15, 2020)