From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stone v. Chambers-Smith

United States District Court, Southern District of Ohio
Sep 8, 2023
2:23-cv-424 (S.D. Ohio Sep. 8, 2023)

Opinion

2:23-cv-424

09-08-2023

JAMARR R. STONE, Plaintiff, v. ANNETTE CHAMBERS-SMITH, Defendant.


Caroline H. Gentry, Magistrate Judge

ORDER

SARAH D. MORRISON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

This matter is before the Court on the August 4, 2023 Report and Recommendation issued by the Magistrate Judge. (ECF No. 7.) The Magistrate Judge performed an initial screen of the Complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) and 1915A and recommended that Plaintiff be permitted to proceed with Count Three to the extent he alleges a violation of the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution. The Magistrate Judge recommended dismissal of all other claims. A copy of the Report and Recommendation was mailed to Plaintiff on August 15, 2023. The time for filing objections has passed, and no objections have been filed.

For the reasons set forth therein, the Court ADOPTS and AFFIRMS the Report and Recommendation. (ECF No. 7.) Plaintiff is PERMITTED to proceed on Count Three of the Complaint to the extent he alleges a violation of the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution. All other claims are hereby DISMISSED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Stone v. Chambers-Smith

United States District Court, Southern District of Ohio
Sep 8, 2023
2:23-cv-424 (S.D. Ohio Sep. 8, 2023)
Case details for

Stone v. Chambers-Smith

Case Details

Full title:JAMARR R. STONE, Plaintiff, v. ANNETTE CHAMBERS-SMITH, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of Ohio

Date published: Sep 8, 2023

Citations

2:23-cv-424 (S.D. Ohio Sep. 8, 2023)

Citing Cases

Fisher v. Mae

“The Court need not accept as true factual allegations that are ‘fantastic or delusional' when reviewing a…