From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stone v. Anderson

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Dec 1, 2017
229 So. 3d 1290 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

Opinion

Case No. 5D16–4066

12-01-2017

Roger Lee STONE II, Appellant, v. Monika Lind ANDERSON, Appellee.

Jeffrey A. Conner, Winter Garden, for Appellant. F. W. Blankner, Jr., of Ali & Blankner, Orlando, for Appellee.


Jeffrey A. Conner, Winter Garden, for Appellant.

F. W. Blankner, Jr., of Ali & Blankner, Orlando, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Roger Lee Stone II appeals the trial court's order denying his exceptions to the Report and Recommendation of General Magistrate. We agree that the child support amount was erroneously calculated because Stone was to receive approximately 136 overnights per year with the minor child, not 103 overnights as utilized in the child support calculations.

We conclude that the other issues raised on appeal are without merit.

AFFIRMED, in part; REVERSED, in part; and REMANDED for recalculation of child support award.

PALMER, TORPY and EVANDER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Stone v. Anderson

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Dec 1, 2017
229 So. 3d 1290 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)
Case details for

Stone v. Anderson

Case Details

Full title:Roger Lee STONE II, Appellant, v. Monika Lind ANDERSON, Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Date published: Dec 1, 2017

Citations

229 So. 3d 1290 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)