From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stombaugh v. Morey

Appellate Court of Illinois, Third District
Feb 28, 1946
328 Ill. App. 397 (Ill. App. Ct. 1946)

Opinion

Gen. No. 9,488. (Abstract of Decision.)

Opinion filed February 28, 1946 Rehearing denied May 7, 1946 Released for publication May 8, 1946

PARTITION, § 71when taxing of costs against property was proper in partition suit. Where defendant in partition suit appealed from order taxing as costs against property allowance for plaintiffs' solicitor's fees, and defendant contended that no attorney's fees should be assessed as costs because suit was not amicable one and defendant was required to employ attorney to protect his interests, held that there was no technical rule governing exact apportionment of costs in partition suit, but court was required to apportion same equitably, and no error occurred since trial court did not abuse its discretion.

See Callaghan's Illinois Digest, same topic and section number.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Macon county; the Hon. C.Y. MILLER, Judge, presiding.

Affirmed. Heard in this court at the February term, 1946.

James G. Allen, for appellants;

Weilepp Wilson, for appellees.


Not to be published in full. Opinion filed February 28, 1946; rehearing denied May 7, 1946; released for publication May 8, 1946.


Summaries of

Stombaugh v. Morey

Appellate Court of Illinois, Third District
Feb 28, 1946
328 Ill. App. 397 (Ill. App. Ct. 1946)
Case details for

Stombaugh v. Morey

Case Details

Full title:Millie E. Stombaugh et al., Appellees, v. Henry M. Morey et al., Appellants

Court:Appellate Court of Illinois, Third District

Date published: Feb 28, 1946

Citations

328 Ill. App. 397 (Ill. App. Ct. 1946)
66 N.E.2d 321

Citing Cases

O'Malley v. Walker

To sustain the entry of the order apportioning as costs among the parties her attorney's fee, plaintiff…