From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stoller v. Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company

United States District Court, D. Arizona
Aug 4, 2011
No. CV 11-01105-GMS-JRI (D. Ariz. Aug. 4, 2011)

Opinion

No. CV 11-01105-GMS-JRI.

August 4, 2011


ORDER


Plaintiff Christopher Stoller, who is confined in the Lake County Adult Corrections Facility, in Waukegan, Illinois, filed a pro se Complaint asserting fraud claims and violations of his constitutional rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 with a pro se motion to proceed in forma pauperis, which was not on this District's court-approved form. (Doc. 1.) In an Order filed on July 25, 2011, this Court denied Plaintiff's in forma pauperis motion with leave to file a new in forma pauperis application within 30 days using this District's required form. (Doc. 9.) The Clerk of Court mailed Plaintiff the court-approved form. (Id.) On August 3, 2011, Plaintiff filed a notice of interlocutory appeal concerning the denial of his in forma pauperis motion and a motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis. Plaintiff's motion will be denied. (Doc. 11, 12.)

I. Payment of Filing Fee

When bringing an action, a prisoner must either pay the $350.00 filing fee in a lump sum or, if granted the privilege of proceeding in forma pauperis, pay the fee incrementally as set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). An application to proceed in forma pauperis requires an affidavit of indigence and a certified copy of the inmate's trust account statement for the six months preceding the filing of the Complaint. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2). An inmate must submit statements from each institution where he was confined during the six-month period.Id. To assist prisoners in meeting these requirements, the Court requires use of a form application. LRCiv 3.4(a).

If a prisoner is granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis, the Court will assess an initial partial filing fee of 20% of either the average monthly deposits or the average monthly balance in Plaintiff's account, whichever is greater. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). An initial partial filing fee will only be collected when funds exist. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(4). The balance of the fee will be collected in monthly payments of 20% of the preceding month's income credited to an inmate's account, each time the amount in the account exceeds $10.00. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2).

II. Plaintiff's Motion to Appeal In Forma Pauperis

Plaintiff asks the Court to grant him in forma pauperis status on his interlocutory appeal. Rule 24(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure requires a party who desires to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal to file a motion in the district court which includes an affidavit that: "(A) shows in the detail prescribed by Form 4 of the Appendix of Forms the party's inability to pay or to give security for fees and costs; (B) claims an entitlement to redress; and (C) states the issues that the party intends to present on appeal." Fed.R.App.P. 24(a)(1). The Court will deny Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal because he has not fully complied with Rule 24(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure and because the Court finds that the interlocutory appeal of a non appealable order is an appeal that is not taken in good faith. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 24(a)(4), the Court will direct the Clerk of Court to immediately notify Plaintiff and the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals of this denial. IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis is denied. (Doc. 12.)


Summaries of

Stoller v. Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company

United States District Court, D. Arizona
Aug 4, 2011
No. CV 11-01105-GMS-JRI (D. Ariz. Aug. 4, 2011)
Case details for

Stoller v. Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company

Case Details

Full title:Christopher Stoller, Plaintiff, v. Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company…

Court:United States District Court, D. Arizona

Date published: Aug 4, 2011

Citations

No. CV 11-01105-GMS-JRI (D. Ariz. Aug. 4, 2011)