From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stoller v. Attorney Registration & Disciplinary Comm'n

Supreme Court of the United States
May 27, 2008
553 U.S. 1063 (2008)

Opinion

No. 07–10194.

2008-05-27

Leo STOLLER, petitioner, v. ATTORNEY REGISTRATION AND DISCIPLINARY COMMISSION.


Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Illinois dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1, 113 S.Ct. 397, 121 L.Ed.2d 305 (1992) ( per curiam). Justice STEVENS dissents. See id., at 4, 113 S.Ct. 397 and cases cited therein.


Summaries of

Stoller v. Attorney Registration & Disciplinary Comm'n

Supreme Court of the United States
May 27, 2008
553 U.S. 1063 (2008)
Case details for

Stoller v. Attorney Registration & Disciplinary Comm'n

Case Details

Full title:Leo STOLLER, petitioner, v. ATTORNEY REGISTRATION AND DISCIPLINARY…

Court:Supreme Court of the United States

Date published: May 27, 2008

Citations

553 U.S. 1063 (2008)
128 S. Ct. 2514
171 L. Ed. 2d 785
76 U.S.L.W. 3629