From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stokes v. United States

DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, EASTERN DIVISION
Oct 14, 2014
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:12cv925-MHT (WO) (M.D. Ala. Oct. 14, 2014)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:12cv925-MHT (WO)

10-14-2014

BRADLEY WAYNE STOKES, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.


JUDGMENT

In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court:

(1) The United States Magistrate Judge's recommendation (Doc. No. 10) is adopted.

(2) The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. No. 1) is denied as time-barred.

It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against petitioner, for which execution may issue.

The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

This case is closed.

DONE, this the 14th day of October, 2014.

/s/ Myron H. Thompson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Stokes v. United States

DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, EASTERN DIVISION
Oct 14, 2014
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:12cv925-MHT (WO) (M.D. Ala. Oct. 14, 2014)
Case details for

Stokes v. United States

Case Details

Full title:BRADLEY WAYNE STOKES, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Oct 14, 2014

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:12cv925-MHT (WO) (M.D. Ala. Oct. 14, 2014)

Citing Cases

Welch v. United States

28 U.S.C. § 2255(f). Since Welch did not appeal, his conviction became final 14 days after his February 21,…

United States v. Pelissier

18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). Courts to address the issue have rejected similar arguments. See Stokes v. United…