Stokes v. Sandor

Full title: RALPH PAUL STOKES, Petitioner, v. GARY SANDOR, Warden, Respondent.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Apr 20, 2010

CV 09-6526-SJO (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 20, 2010)

Opinion

RALPH PAUL STOKES, Petitioner, v. GARY SANDOR, Warden, Respondent. No. CV 09-6526-SJO (JEM). United States District Court, C.D. California. April 20, 2010.

          ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          S. JAMES OTERO, District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the pleadings, all the records and files herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Petitioner has filed Objections to the Report and Recommendation, and the Court has made a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which Petitioner has objected. The Court concurs with and adopts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

         IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Respondent's Motion to Dismiss the Petition as untimely be granted and that judgment be entered denying and dismissing the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus with prejudice.