From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stokes v. Rains

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jan 25, 2024
23-cv-02410-RFL (N.D. Cal. Jan. 25, 2024)

Opinion

23-cv-02410-RFL

01-25-2024

MICHAEL STOKES, Plaintiff, v. TRAVER D. RAINS, Defendant.


ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE RE: DKT. NO. 31

RITA F. LIN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

On December 6, 2023, the Court issued an order denying without prejudice Michael Stokes's motion for alternate service and directing him to file either proof of service on Traver D. Rains or a renewed motion for alternative service within 45 days from the date of the order. To date, no such filing has been made. Accordingly, Stokes is ordered to show cause, in writing, by February 8, 2024, why his complaint should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Alternatively, Stokes may file either proof of service on Rains or a renewed motion for alternative service by that date. Failure to timely respond to this order will result in the dismissal of this case. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Stokes v. Rains

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jan 25, 2024
23-cv-02410-RFL (N.D. Cal. Jan. 25, 2024)
Case details for

Stokes v. Rains

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL STOKES, Plaintiff, v. TRAVER D. RAINS, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Jan 25, 2024

Citations

23-cv-02410-RFL (N.D. Cal. Jan. 25, 2024)