From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stokes v. Barnhart

United States District Court, D. Maine
Apr 2, 2003
Civil No. 02-103-P-H (D. Me. Apr. 2, 2003)

Opinion

Civil No. 02-103-P-H

April 2, 2003.


ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE


The United States Magistrate Judge filed with the court on March 13, 2003, with copies to counsel, his Memorandum Decision on Defendants' Motion to Substitute and Plaintiff's Motion to Amend Complaint and Recommended Decision on Defendants' Motions to Dismiss and for Summary Judgment. The time within which to file objections expired on March 31, 2003, and no objections have been filed. The Magistrate Judge notified the parties that failure to object would waive their right to de novo review and appeal.

It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. The defendants' motion to dismiss is GRANTED except as to the claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress set forth in Count II of the Amended Complaint. The motion for summary judgment on that claim is DENIED.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Stokes v. Barnhart

United States District Court, D. Maine
Apr 2, 2003
Civil No. 02-103-P-H (D. Me. Apr. 2, 2003)
Case details for

Stokes v. Barnhart

Case Details

Full title:ALAN STOKES, Plaintiff, v. JO ANNE B. BARNHART, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL…

Court:United States District Court, D. Maine

Date published: Apr 2, 2003

Citations

Civil No. 02-103-P-H (D. Me. Apr. 2, 2003)