From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stoddard v. Manzella

Supreme Court, Albany Trial Term
Mar 1, 1924
123 Misc. 672 (N.Y. Misc. 1924)

Opinion

March, 1924.

Clarence C. Fowler ( Sidney M. Louis, of counsel), for the plaintiff.

John Goodrum Miller, for the defendant.


The contention that the assessment is invalid and illegal as to this defendant is untenable. The company was organized to do business on March 2, 1921. The defendant became a member and a policyholder on May 1, 1921. In September, 1922, the company levied an assessment for the losses and expenses sustained and incurred by the company for the period ending December 31, 1921. This assessment was prorated among the policyholders during that period in proportion to the premium earned on each policy for the term ending December 31, 1921, and the amount of total losses and expenses.

Each member assumed under his policy the obligation to pay the losses and expenses incurred during the period of his membership. When an assessment is levied upon the members of a mutual insurance company in accordance with the authority of law and the terms of the policy, there arises a presumption of its necessity and of its accuracy. The proof in this case fails to overcome such presumption, but on the contrary establishes that the assessment was within the contractual obligation assumed by the defendant.

The experience of this company would indicate that its underwriting basis in the first instance was not sound, and like many mutual companies, the desire to attract business on a low rate of insurance has led to the necessity of the assessment as the price for cheap protection. With the situation existing of daily additions and withdrawals of members and policyholders, it is a practical impossibility to measure with precise exactitude the liability of each member for losses and expenses incurred. All that is essential to make the assessment a valid one is that it be based upon a fair method of calculation and be substantially correct.

So far as this defendant is concerned, I regard the assessment as a correct and valid one from the facts in the case, and that the defendant is not being called upon by the payment of the assessment levied to do anything beyond the obligation which he assumed when he became a member.

Findings of fact and conclusions of law are transmitted herewith, awarding the judgment to the plaintiff, with costs.

Judgment accordingly.


Summaries of

Stoddard v. Manzella

Supreme Court, Albany Trial Term
Mar 1, 1924
123 Misc. 672 (N.Y. Misc. 1924)
Case details for

Stoddard v. Manzella

Case Details

Full title:FRANCIS R. STODDARD, JR., Superintendent of Insurance of the State of New…

Court:Supreme Court, Albany Trial Term

Date published: Mar 1, 1924

Citations

123 Misc. 672 (N.Y. Misc. 1924)
206 N.Y.S. 140

Citing Cases

Mitchell v. Pacific Greyhound Lines

In an assessment as we have here, such an exactitude would defeat assessment. It is sufficient, if the…