From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stockford v. The Christman Co.

Supreme Court of Michigan
Apr 29, 2024
SC 166711 (Mich. Apr. 29, 2024)

Opinion

SC 166711 COA 366694

04-29-2024

JOEL STOCKFORD, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. THE CHRISTMAN COMPANY, Defendant/Cross-Plaintiff. And SHAW WINKLER, INC., Defendant/Cross-Defendant, and SODEXOMAGIC, LLC, Defendant/Cross-Defendant, Appellant, and LANSING SCHOOL DISTRICT, Defendant.


Ingham CC: 20-000262-NO

Elizabeth T. Clement, Chief Justice, Brian K. Zahra, David F. Viviano, Richard H. Bernstein, Megan K. Cavanagh, Elizabeth M. Welch, Kyra H. Bolden, Justices.

ORDER

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 11, 2024 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should now be reviewed by this Court.

BERNSTEIN, J., did not participate because he has a family member with an interest that could be affected by the proceeding.


Summaries of

Stockford v. The Christman Co.

Supreme Court of Michigan
Apr 29, 2024
SC 166711 (Mich. Apr. 29, 2024)
Case details for

Stockford v. The Christman Co.

Case Details

Full title:JOEL STOCKFORD, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. THE CHRISTMAN COMPANY…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan

Date published: Apr 29, 2024

Citations

SC 166711 (Mich. Apr. 29, 2024)