From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stitch et al. v. Danciger Bros

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Jan 11, 1916
154 P. 514 (Okla. 1916)

Opinion

No. 5779

Opinion Filed January 11, 1916.

APPEAL AND ERROR — Failure to File Brief — Reversal. The syllabus in Messer v. White Sewing Machine Co., 48 Okla. 461, 149 P. 1097, is adopted as the syllabus in this case.

(Syllabus by the Court.)

Error from County Court, Payne County; W.H. Wilcox, Judge.

Action by Danciger Brothers, a co-partnership, against N.A. Stitch and another. Judgment for the plaintiff, and defendants bring error. Reversed and remanded for new trial.

J.M. Springer, for plaintiffs in error.

Freeman Miller, for defendant in error.


This cause was docketed in this court on November 11, 1913, and was submitted on December 6, 1915. The plaintiffs in error duly filed their brief, as required by the rules, on August 14, 1915, but the defendant in error has filed no brief, nor asked for an extension of time, nor given any reason for not doing so. We have examined the record and brief of plaintiffs in error, and the brief reasonably sustains the contentions therein.

We therefore recommend that the judgment be reversed, and the cause remanded for a new trial.

By the Court: It is so ordered.


Summaries of

Stitch et al. v. Danciger Bros

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Jan 11, 1916
154 P. 514 (Okla. 1916)
Case details for

Stitch et al. v. Danciger Bros

Case Details

Full title:STITCH et al. v. DANCIGER BROS

Court:Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Date published: Jan 11, 1916

Citations

154 P. 514 (Okla. 1916)
154 P. 514

Citing Cases

Bradley v. Morris

Following this rule the judgment in this case will be reversed and the case remanded to the trial court with…

Adams v. Butler

Shapleigh Hdw. Co. v. Pritchard, 25 Okla. 808, 108 P. 360; School Dist. No. 30, Pottawatomie County, v.…