From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stinnett v. Garcia

United States District Court, Western District of Oklahoma
Jan 6, 2022
No. CIV-21-01105-JD (W.D. Okla. Jan. 6, 2022)

Opinion

CIV-21-01105-JD

01-06-2022

JOHNETTA STINNETT, Plaintiff, v. BISMARK ANTONIO GARCIA doing business as B Garcia Truckin; and JUAN INFANTE, Defendants.


ORDER

JODI W. DISHMAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Before the Court is Defendants' Partial Motion to Dismiss (“Motion”). [Doc. No. 7]. Plaintiff then filed an Amended Complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(2). [See Doc. No. 16; see also Doc. No. 17]. Plaintiff's amendment “supersedes the original and renders it of no legal effect.” Davis v. TXO Prod. Corp., 929 F.2d 1515, 1517 (10th Cir. 1991); see Predator Int'l, Inc. v. Gamo Outdoor USA, Inc., 793 F.3d 1177, 1180-81 (10th Cir. 2015); Mink v. Suthers, 482 F.3d 1244, 1254 (10th Cir. 2007). Thus, the Motion is moot.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendants' Partial Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 7] is DENIED as moot and without prejudice.

IT IS ORDERED


Summaries of

Stinnett v. Garcia

United States District Court, Western District of Oklahoma
Jan 6, 2022
No. CIV-21-01105-JD (W.D. Okla. Jan. 6, 2022)
Case details for

Stinnett v. Garcia

Case Details

Full title:JOHNETTA STINNETT, Plaintiff, v. BISMARK ANTONIO GARCIA doing business as…

Court:United States District Court, Western District of Oklahoma

Date published: Jan 6, 2022

Citations

No. CIV-21-01105-JD (W.D. Okla. Jan. 6, 2022)