From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stinnett v. Ellis

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Feb 26, 1970
173 S.E.2d 454 (Ga. Ct. App. 1970)

Summary

In Stinnett v. Ellis, 121 Ga. App. 279, this court held: "`Tort actions may be brought against any corporation chartered by authority of this State in the county where the cause of action originated only if the corporation has in such county an agent, or if there be none, then an agency or place of business.

Summary of this case from Hunton v. Colonial Pipeline Co.

Opinion

44868.

SUBMITTED NOVEMBER 4, 1969.

DECIDED FEBRUARY 26, 1970.

Action for damages. Murray Superior Court. Before Judge Vining.

Mitchell Mitchell, Coy H. Temples, for appellants.

J. Paxson Amis, for appellee.


The plaintiff's complaint for damages, for alleged negligence arising out of a motor vehicle collision on May 20, 1968, was brought in the Superior Court of Murray County where the collision occurred. The truck involved was allegedly owned by defendants, Southern Decorators, Inc., and Fred Thompson, and was driven by defendant David H. Stinnett.

With regard to defendants Thompson and Stinnett, the complaint alleged that they were residents of Whitfield County. Defendant Southern Decorators, Inc., was alleged to be a corporation incorporated under the laws of the State of Georgia, with its principle place of business in Dalton, Whitfield County, Ga., and having as its agent for service Mr. Fred Thompson, 220 North Pentz Street, Dalton, Ga.

"Tort actions may be brought against any corporation chartered by authority of this State in the county where the cause of action originated only if the corporation has in such county an agent or, if there be none, then an agency or place of business. Code § 22-1102 (Ga. L. 1884-5, p. 99); Tuggle v. Enterprise Lumber Co., 123 Ga. 480 ( 51 S.E. 433); Swift Co. v. Lawson, 95 Ga. App. 35, 43 (1, a) ( 97 S.E.2d 168), and cases cited." Mavity v. First of Ga. Ins. Co., 115 Ga. App. 763 (3) ( 156 S.E.2d 191). Code Ann. § 22-1102 was re-enacted without change in the Georgia Business Corporation Code as § 22-5301 (Ga. L. 1968, pp. 565, 820).

With no basis appearing in the complaint for maintaining the action in Murray County against any of the named defendants, it was error to overrule defendant Stinnett's motion to dismiss on that account. Georgia Constitution (1945), Art. VI, Sec. XIV, Par. VI ( Code Ann. § 2-4906); Code § 3-201.

Judgment reversed. Jordan, P. J., and Evans, J., concur.

SUBMITTED NOVEMBER 4, 1969 — DECIDED FEBRUARY 26, 1970.


Summaries of

Stinnett v. Ellis

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Feb 26, 1970
173 S.E.2d 454 (Ga. Ct. App. 1970)

In Stinnett v. Ellis, 121 Ga. App. 279, this court held: "`Tort actions may be brought against any corporation chartered by authority of this State in the county where the cause of action originated only if the corporation has in such county an agent, or if there be none, then an agency or place of business.

Summary of this case from Hunton v. Colonial Pipeline Co.
Case details for

Stinnett v. Ellis

Case Details

Full title:STINNETT et al. v. ELLIS

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Feb 26, 1970

Citations

173 S.E.2d 454 (Ga. Ct. App. 1970)
173 S.E.2d 454

Citing Cases

Tecumseh Products Co. v. Sears c. Co.

Service of such suits may be affected by leaving a copy of the writ with the agent of the defendant, or if…

Orkin Ext. Co. v. Gilland

Thus, the present "ex delicto" action may be maintained in either of two jurisdictions: (a) the county of the…