From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stiner v. Brookdale Senior Living, Inc.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jan 9, 2024
4:17-CV-03962-HSG (N.D. Cal. Jan. 9, 2024)

Opinion

4:17-CV-03962-HSG

01-09-2024

STACIA STINER, et al., Plaintiffs, v. BROOKDALE SENIOR LIVING INC., et al., Defendants.

GUY B. WALLACE - 176151 MARK T. JOHNSON - 76904 SCHNEIDER WALLACE COTTRELL KONECKY LLP GAY CROSTHWAIT GRUNFELD - 121944 JENNY S. YELIN - 273601 BENJAMIN BIEN-KAHN - 267933 AMY XU - 330707 ROSEN BIEN GALVAN & GRUNFELD LLP ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS AND THE CERTIFIED CLASS MOORE & LEE, LLP ERICA RUTNER (SBN 344880) E.RUTNER@MOOREANDLEE.COM JOHN A. BERTINO (VBN 93393) (PRO HAC VICE) SEYFARTH SHAW LLP MICHAEL JACOBSEN (IL SBN 6303584) (PRO HAC VICE) SEYFARTH SHAW LLP JUSTIN T. CURLEY (SBN 233287) JCURLEY@SEYFARTH.COM ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS BROOKDALE SENIOR LIVING INC. AND BROOKDALE SENIOR LIVING COMMUNITIES, INC.


GUY B. WALLACE - 176151 MARK T. JOHNSON - 76904 SCHNEIDER WALLACE COTTRELL KONECKY LLP

GAY CROSTHWAIT GRUNFELD - 121944 JENNY S. YELIN - 273601 BENJAMIN BIEN-KAHN - 267933 AMY XU - 330707 ROSEN BIEN GALVAN & GRUNFELD LLP ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS AND THE CERTIFIED CLASS

MOORE & LEE, LLP ERICA RUTNER (SBN 344880) E.RUTNER@MOOREANDLEE.COM JOHN A. BERTINO (VBN 93393) (PRO HAC VICE)

SEYFARTH SHAW LLP MICHAEL JACOBSEN (IL SBN 6303584) (PRO HAC VICE)

SEYFARTH SHAW LLP JUSTIN T. CURLEY (SBN 233287) JCURLEY@SEYFARTH.COM

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS BROOKDALE SENIOR LIVING INC. AND BROOKDALE SENIOR LIVING COMMUNITIES, INC.

ORDER AS MODIFIED GRANTING OMNIBUS MOTION TO SEAL

DKT. NO. 641

HON. HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

ORDER

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court on the Parties' Omnibus Motion To Seal (“Motion”). Dkt. No. 641. Being fully advised, it is:

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Motion is hereby GRANTED. Dkt. No. 641.

This order TERMINATES Dkt. Nos. 615, 620, 622, and 624.

Information To Be Redacted And Filed Under Seal

Current Docket No. Public / Sealed

Prior Docket No. Public / Sealed

Document(s)

Portion(s) Sought To Be Sealed

Reasons For Sealing

Request Opposed

641-4 / 641-5

616-1 / 615- 4

Declaration Of Mark T. Johnson In Support Of Plaintiffs' Administrative Motion Re Notice To The Class And Former Putative Class Members, Exhibit A

Full document

Confidential business information (“CBI”) Jacobsen Decl. at ¶ 4.a.

Plaintiffs take no position on whether there is good cause to seal the document.

641-6 / 641-7

616-1 / 615- 4

Declaration Of Mark T. Johnson In Support Of Plaintiffs' Administrative Motion Re Notice To The Class And Former Putative Class Members, Exhibit B

Full document

CBI Jacobsen Decl. at ¶ 4.b.

Plaintiffs take no position on whether there is good cause to seal the document.

Current Docket No. Public / Sealed

Prior Docket No. Public / Sealed

Document(s)

Portion(s) Sought To Be Sealed

Reasons For Sealing

Request Opposed

641-8 / 641-9

616-1 / 615- 4

Declaration Of Mark T. Johnson In Support Of Plaintiffs' Administrative Motion Re Notice To The Class And Former Putative Class Members, Exhibit C

Resident names and floor numbers

Personally-identifying information (“PII”) Jacobsen Decl. at ¶ 4.c.

Plaintiffs join the request to make the proposed redactions.

641-10 / 641-11

616-1 / 615- 4

Declaration Of Mark T. Johnson In Support Of Plaintiffs' Administrative Motion Re Notice To The Class And Former Putative Class Members, Exhibit D

Employee phone numbers and email addresses and contents of email chain reflecting information from Emergency Manual

PII & CBI Jacobsen Decl. at ¶ 4.d.

Plaintiffs join the request to redact employee phone numbers and email addresses. Plaintiffs take no position on whether there is good cause to redact contents of email chain reflecting information from the Emergency Manual.

641-12 / 641-13

616-1 / 615- 4

Declaration Of Mark T. Johnson In Support Of Plaintiffs' Administrative Motion Re Notice To The Class And Former Putative Class Members, Exhibit E

Full document

CBI Jacobsen Decl. at ¶ 4.e.

Plaintiffs take no position on whether there is good cause to seal the document.

Current Docket No. Public / Sealed

Prior Docket No. Public / Sealed

Document(s)

Portion(s) Sought To Be Sealed

Reasons For Sealing

Request Opposed

641-14 / 641-15

616-1 / 615- 4

Declaration Of Mark T. Johnson In Support Of Plaintiffs' Administrative Motion Re Notice To The Class And Former Putative Class Members, Exhibit G

Resident name

PII Jacobsen Decl. at ¶ 4.f.

Plaintiffs join the request to make the proposed redaction.

641-16 / 641-17

622-4 / 622- 5

Declaration Of Mark T. Johnson In Support Of Plaintiffs' Administrative Motion Re Notice To The Class And Former Putative Class Members

Paragraphs 3 (Page 2:17-18), 4 (2:22-24), and 7 (3:19-28)

CBI Jacobsen Decl. at ¶ 4.g.

Plaintiffs take no position on whether there is good cause for the proposed redactions.

Relative to Defendants' requests, the Jacobsen Declaration provides more detailed explanations as to the nature of and reasons for redacting and/or sealing each item, including citations to additional declarations and legal authority, in order to maintain the legibility of this document.


Summaries of

Stiner v. Brookdale Senior Living, Inc.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jan 9, 2024
4:17-CV-03962-HSG (N.D. Cal. Jan. 9, 2024)
Case details for

Stiner v. Brookdale Senior Living, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:STACIA STINER, et al., Plaintiffs, v. BROOKDALE SENIOR LIVING INC., et…

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Jan 9, 2024

Citations

4:17-CV-03962-HSG (N.D. Cal. Jan. 9, 2024)