From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stimac v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - SACRAMENTO DIVISION
May 8, 2013
Case No.: 2:13-cv-00619-LKK-CMK (E.D. Cal. May. 8, 2013)

Opinion

Case No.: 2:13-cv-00619-LKK-CMK

05-08-2013

LORRIE ELLEN STIMAC, an individual, Plaintiff, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Successor to WORLD SAVINGS BANK, FSB, AND WACHOVIA CORPORATION, FSB; CAL WESTERN RECONVEYANCE CORPORATION and DOES 1 through 50 inclusive. Defendants

Attorneys for Plaintiff Chad T-W Pratt, Sr. Marilyn S. Yee Real Estate Law Center, PC


[The Honorable Lawrence K. Karlton]


ORDER RE GRANTING DEFENDANTS'

NOTICE OF CONTINUANCE OF

MOTION TO DISMISS


Date: July 8, 2013

Having read and considered the agreement of counsel for Plaintiff and Defendants, and good cause appearing:

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

1. The current hearing date of May 13, 2013 for defendant Wells Fargo's motion to dismiss complaint is hereby continued to July 8, 2013, at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 4, 15th Floor of the above-captioned court.

2. All further briefs shall be filed in accordance with the Court's rules consistent with the July 8, 2013 hearing date.

_________________

LAWRENCE K. KARLTON

SENIOR JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, the undersigned, declare that I am over the age of 18 and am not a party to this action. I am employed in the City of Pasadena, California; my business address is Anglin, Flewelling, Rasmussen, Campbell & Trytten LLP, 199 S. Los Robles Avenue, Suite 600, Pasadena, California 91101-2459.

On the date below, I served a copy of the foregoing document entitled:

[PROPOSED] ORDER RE GRANTING DEFENDANTS' NOTICE OF CONTINUANCE

OF MOTION TO DISMISS

on the interested parties in said case as follows:

Served By Means Other than Electronically Via the Court's

CM/ECF System


Attorneys for Plaintiff

Chad T-W Pratt, Sr.

Marilyn S. Yee

Real Estate Law Center, PC

[X] BY MAIL: I am readily familiar with the firm's practice of collection and processing correspondence by mailing. Under that same practice it would be deposited with U.S. Postal Service on that same day with postage fully prepaid at Pasadena, California in the ordinary course of business. I am aware that on motion of the party served, service is presumed invalid if postal cancellation date or postage meter date is more than one day after date of deposit for mailing in affidavit.

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct. I declare that I am employed in the office of a member of the Bar of this Court, at whose direction the service was made. This declaration is executed in Pasadena, California on May 6, 2013.

Vanessa Ngo

(Type or Print Name)

Vanessa Ngo

(Signature of Declarant)


Summaries of

Stimac v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - SACRAMENTO DIVISION
May 8, 2013
Case No.: 2:13-cv-00619-LKK-CMK (E.D. Cal. May. 8, 2013)
Case details for

Stimac v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Case Details

Full title:LORRIE ELLEN STIMAC, an individual, Plaintiff, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - SACRAMENTO DIVISION

Date published: May 8, 2013

Citations

Case No.: 2:13-cv-00619-LKK-CMK (E.D. Cal. May. 8, 2013)