Stidhem v. Schwartz

Full title: DONALD STIDHEM, Plaintiff, v. LORINDA SCHWARTZ, Chaplain, et al.…

Court: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Date published: Jan 10, 2018

2:15-cv-00379-TC (D. Or. Jan. 10, 2018)

Opinion

2:15-cv-00379-TC

01-10-2018

DONALD STIDHEM, Plaintiff, v. LORINDA SCHWARTZ, Chaplain, et al., Defendants.

MCSHANE, Judge

ORDER :

Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Coffin filed a Findings and Recommendation (ECF No. 98), and the matter is now before me. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Plaintiff filed objections to the Findings and Recommendation. Accordingly, I have reviewed the file of this case de novo. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(c); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9^th Cir. 1981). I find no error and conclude the report is correct.¹

1 The Court declines to consider arguments or evidence not presented to Judge Coffin. --------

Magistrate Judge Coffin's Findings and Recommendation (ECF No. 98) is adopted in full. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 76) is GRANTED. IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 10th day of January, 2018.

/s/ Michael J. McShane

Michael McShane

United States District Judge