Opinion
Court of Appeals Case No. 18A02-1410-PL-750
12-16-2015
Scott Alan Stibbins, individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Warren E. Stibbins, and Trustee of the Warren E. Stibbins Revocable Trust, et al, Appellants-Defendants, v. Carol (Stibbins) Pagano Foster, Angela Pagano, and Christopher Pagano, Appellees-Plaintiffs
ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT P. Gregory Cross The Cross Law Firm, P.C. Muncie, Indiana ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEES Thomas M. Beeman Kyle B. DeHaven Beeman Law Office Anderson, Indiana Alexander M. Beeman Ciobanu Law, P.C. Indianapolis, Indiana
OPINION ON REHEARING
ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT
P. Gregory Cross
The Cross Law Firm, P.C.
Muncie, Indiana
ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEES
Thomas M. Beeman
Kyle B. DeHaven
Beeman Law Office
Anderson, Indiana
Alexander M. Beeman
Ciobanu Law, P.C.
Indianapolis, Indiana
Appeal from the Delaware Circuit Court
The Honorable Marianne L. Vorhees, Judge
Trial Court Cause No. 18C01-0902-PL-4
Baker, Judge.
[1] The appellants have filed a petition for rehearing, raising a number of arguments with respect to our opinion in this case. We grant the petition for the limited purpose of striking the final sentence of footnote two, which shall now read as follows in its entirety:
The expert testified that dozens of specimens of Warren's handwriting were forgeries. She was also certain that the signatures of all of the witnesses to nearly all of the documents at issue in this litigation were forgeries. Carol found this expert on the Internet. The expert received her training from another Internet vendor who also offered programs on, among other things, how to predict the gender of unborn children through the handwriting of a parent.
In all other respects, we deny the petition for rehearing.
Bailey, J., and Mathias, J., concur.