From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stewart v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Sep 11, 1997
949 S.W.2d 893 (Ark. 1997)

Opinion

CR 97-942

Opinion delivered September 11, 1997

APPEAL ERROR — MOTION FOR RULE ON CLERK TREATED AS MOTION FOR BELATED APPEAL — GOOD CAUSE FOR GRANTING. — An admission by an attorney for a criminal defendant that the notice of appeal was untimely filed due to negligence on his part is good cause to treat a motion for rule on the clerk as one for belated appeal and to grant the motion.

Motion for Belated Appeal and Rule on the Clerk Treated as Motion for Belated Appeal; granted.

Irwin Law Firm, by: Robert E. Irwin, for appellant.

No response.


The appellant, Sam Stewart, has filed a motion styled, "Motion to File Belated Appeal and for a Rule on the Clerk." Mr. Stewart's attorney, Robert E. Irwin, admits that the notice of appeal was untimely filed due to negligence on his part.

[1] We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to treat this motion as one for belated appeal and grant the motion. See In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam). A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.


Summaries of

Stewart v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Sep 11, 1997
949 S.W.2d 893 (Ark. 1997)
Case details for

Stewart v. State

Case Details

Full title:Sam STEWART v . STATE of Arkansas

Court:Supreme Court of Arkansas

Date published: Sep 11, 1997

Citations

949 S.W.2d 893 (Ark. 1997)
949 S.W.2d 893