From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stewart v. Oregon

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
May 21, 2012
6: 12-00155-TC (D. Or. May. 21, 2012)

Opinion

6: 12-00155-TC

05-21-2012

SAMANTHA CATHLEEN STEWART, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF OREGON, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Magistrate Judge Thomas M Coffin has filed his Findings and Recommendation on April 20, 2012- The matter is now before me. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). No objections have been timely filed. This relieves me of my obligation to give the factual findings de novo review. Lorin Corp. v. Goto & Co., Ltd., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (9th Cir. 1982). See also Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.

Accordingly, I ADOPT Judge Coffin's Findings and Recommendation. Plaintiff's amended complaint (#8) is dismissed with prejudice. This proceeding is dismissed. The clerk of court will enter judgment accordingly.

____________________________

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Stewart v. Oregon

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
May 21, 2012
6: 12-00155-TC (D. Or. May. 21, 2012)
Case details for

Stewart v. Oregon

Case Details

Full title:SAMANTHA CATHLEEN STEWART, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF OREGON, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Date published: May 21, 2012

Citations

6: 12-00155-TC (D. Or. May. 21, 2012)