From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stewart v. Martin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS BEAUMONT DIVISION
Dec 2, 2011
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:11-CV-495 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 2, 2011)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:11-CV-495

12-02-2011

ROBERT STEWART v. M. MARTIN


MEMORANDUM ORDER OVERRULING PETITIONER'S OBJECTIONS AND ADOPTING

THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Petitioner Robert Stewart, a federal prisoner confined in Beaumont, Texas, brought this petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241.

The court ordered that this matter be referred to the Honorable Keith F. Giblin, United States Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this court. The magistrate judge has submitted a Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. The magistrate judge recommends dismissing the petition.

The court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge, along with the record and the pleadings. Petitioner filed objections to the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation.

The court has conducted a de novo review of the objections in relation to the pleadings and the applicable law. See FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b). After careful consideration, the court concludes the objections are without merit. In support of his claims, petitioner cites Bond v. United States, _ U.S. _, 131 S. Ct. 2355 (2011). In Bond, the Supreme Court held that a person convicted of a federal offense had standing to assert that Congress exceeded its power under the Tenth Amendment in enacting a criminal statute. Bond did not invalidate the federal statutes that petitioner was convicted of violating. Petitioner may not pursue habeas relief under § 2241 because his claims do not meet the requirements set forth in Reyes-Requena v. United States, 243 F.3d 893, 904 (5th Cir. 2001).

ORDER

Accordingly, petitioner's objections are OVERRULED. The findings of fact and conclusions of law of the magistrate judge are correct, and the report of the magistrate judge is ADOPTED. A final judgment will be entered in this case in accordance with the magistrate judge's recommendation.

Thad Heartfield

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Stewart v. Martin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS BEAUMONT DIVISION
Dec 2, 2011
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:11-CV-495 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 2, 2011)
Case details for

Stewart v. Martin

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT STEWART v. M. MARTIN

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS BEAUMONT DIVISION

Date published: Dec 2, 2011

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:11-CV-495 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 2, 2011)