From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stewart v. Marple

Court of Appeal of California, Fourth District
Oct 13, 1932
126 Cal.App. 771 (Cal. Ct. App. 1932)

Opinion

Docket No. 689.

October 13, 1932.

MOTION to dismiss appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Bernardino County. F.A. Leonard, Judge. Motion granted and appeal dismissed.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

No appearance for Appellant.

Walter E. Byrne and Mills, Hunter Dunn for Respondent.


This is a motion to dismiss this appeal. [1] It appears from the certificate of the clerk of the court below that no proceedings are pending for a settlement of a bill of exceptions or a transcript on appeal and that no notice for the preparation of a transcript under the provisions of section 953a of the Code of Civil Procedure has been filed in his office. The statutory time within which a record on appeal may be prepared and filed under either method of appeal in this state has expired. Upon the authority of Union Trust Co. v. Novotny, 125 Cal.App. 417, 418 [ 13 P.2d 974], the motion is granted and the appeal is dismissed.

Barnard, P.J., and Jennings, J., concurred.


Summaries of

Stewart v. Marple

Court of Appeal of California, Fourth District
Oct 13, 1932
126 Cal.App. 771 (Cal. Ct. App. 1932)
Case details for

Stewart v. Marple

Case Details

Full title:ARTHUR R. STEWART, Appellant, v. WALKER F. MARPLE, Respondent

Court:Court of Appeal of California, Fourth District

Date published: Oct 13, 1932

Citations

126 Cal.App. 771 (Cal. Ct. App. 1932)
15 P.2d 202

Citing Cases

Studebaker v. Bower

The statutory time within which a record on appeal may be prepared and filed having expired, the motion must…

REES v. ROBERTS

From the above-recited facts it is apparent that the motion for dismissal of the appeal is in order and…