From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stewart v. Macomber

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Apr 3, 2024
No. 24-CV-00424-JD (N.D. Cal. Apr. 3, 2024)

Opinion

24-CV-00424-JD

04-03-2024

JAREY STEWART, Petitioner, v. JEFFREY MACOMBER, Respondent.


ORDER RE DISMISSAL

JAMES DONATO UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Petitioner, a state prisoner acting pro se, filed a habeas petition. Petitioner was sent a notice that he had not paid the filing fee or submitted a complete application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). He was provided twenty-eight days to correct these deficiencies. More than twenty-eight days has passed, and petitioner has not paid the fee, filed a complete application to proceed IFP or otherwise communicated with the Court. The case is dismissed without prejudice. A certificate of appealability is denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Stewart v. Macomber

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Apr 3, 2024
No. 24-CV-00424-JD (N.D. Cal. Apr. 3, 2024)
Case details for

Stewart v. Macomber

Case Details

Full title:JAREY STEWART, Petitioner, v. JEFFREY MACOMBER, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Apr 3, 2024

Citations

No. 24-CV-00424-JD (N.D. Cal. Apr. 3, 2024)