From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stewart v. Kamtech Sols. Corp.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 9, 2021
21-CV-1800 (RA) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 9, 2021)

Opinion

21-CV-1800 (RA)

12-09-2021

YOHANCE STEWART and THERESA HUTCHINSON, Plaintiffs, v. KAMTECH SOLUTIONS CORP., SALAL CREDIT UNION, FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE, INC., Defendants.


ORDER

RONNIE ABRAMS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

On October 15, 2021, Defendants filed a letter motion seeking to stay discovery pending a decision on their motions to dismiss. Dkt. 54. Plaintiffs opposed the motion to stay discovery and, on December 8, 2021, filed a motion to compel discovery. Dkts. 56, 57. Having considered the relevant factors in deciding whether to stay discovery pending a dispositive motion-the strength of the dispositive motion, the breadth of discovery sought and the burden of responding to it, and prejudice to the party opposing the stay, see Spencer Trask Software & Info. Servs., LLC v. RPost Int'l Ltd., 206 F.R.D. 367, 368 (S.D.N.Y. 2002)-the Court finds that a stay is appropriate here. Accordingly, discovery in this action is hereby stayed pending further order of the Court.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Stewart v. Kamtech Sols. Corp.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 9, 2021
21-CV-1800 (RA) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 9, 2021)
Case details for

Stewart v. Kamtech Sols. Corp.

Case Details

Full title:YOHANCE STEWART and THERESA HUTCHINSON, Plaintiffs, v. KAMTECH SOLUTIONS…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Dec 9, 2021

Citations

21-CV-1800 (RA) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 9, 2021)