From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stewart v. Commonwealth

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
Sep 16, 2015
122 A.3d 1033 (Pa. 2015)

Opinion

No. 87 EM 2015.

2015-09-16

Edward E. STEWART, III, Petitioner v. COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent.


ORDER


PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 16th day of September, 2015, the Application for Leave to File Original Process, Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, and Application for an Immediate Hearing are DISMISSED. See Commonwealth v. Ellis, 534 Pa. 176, 626 A.2d 1137 (1993) (holding that hybrid representation is impermissible). The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to forward the filings to counsel of record.


Summaries of

Stewart v. Commonwealth

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
Sep 16, 2015
122 A.3d 1033 (Pa. 2015)
Case details for

Stewart v. Commonwealth

Case Details

Full title:EDWARD E. STEWART, III, Petitioner v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT

Date published: Sep 16, 2015

Citations

122 A.3d 1033 (Pa. 2015)