From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stewart v. Caldwell

United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Mar 3, 2011
CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-1913, SECTION "C" (4) (E.D. La. Mar. 3, 2011)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-1913, SECTION "C" (4).

March 3, 2011


ORDER


The Court, having considered the record, the applicable law, the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, and Plaintiff's Objection to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, hereby overrules Plaintiff's Objection and approves the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and adopts it as its opinion in this matter. Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that Stewart's Objection is OVERRULED. (Rec. Doc. 10).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Stewart's § 1983 Complaint filed against Buddy Caldwell, Paul Connick, and David Loeb is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as frivolous, and for failure to state a claim for which relief can be granted pursuant to § 1915(e) and § 1915A.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Stewart's Request for habeas corpus relief is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE and he should pursue any such relief in a properly filed state criminal motion, state writ application, or federal habeas corpus proceeding, if appropriate after exhaustion of available state court remedies.

New Orleans, Louisiana, this 2nd day of March, 2011.


Summaries of

Stewart v. Caldwell

United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Mar 3, 2011
CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-1913, SECTION "C" (4) (E.D. La. Mar. 3, 2011)
Case details for

Stewart v. Caldwell

Case Details

Full title:KEITH STEWART v. ATTORNEY GENERAL BUDDY CALDWELL, ET AL

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana

Date published: Mar 3, 2011

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-1913, SECTION "C" (4) (E.D. La. Mar. 3, 2011)

Citing Cases

Stewart v. Rosso

A review of the records of this Court reflects that the plaintiff has, on three or more prior occasions while…