From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stewart v. Cain

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Aug 6, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-403-JJB-SCR (M.D. La. Aug. 6, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-403-JJB-SCR

08-06-2012

CHARLES STEWART (#111347) v. BURL CAIN, ET AL.


RULING

The court has carefully considered the petition, the record, the law applicable to this action, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Riedliner dated July 6, 2012 (doc. no. 29) to which no objection has been filed.

The court hereby approves the report and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge and adopts it as the court's opinion herein. Accordingly, the defendants' Motion to dismiss is GRANTED IN PART, dismissing the plaintiff's claims that: (1) defendants Capt. Barr and Capt. Conrad denied him medical treatment; (2) defendant Lt. Col. Foster verbally abused him; (3) and defendant Warden Cain failed to properly supervise, train and discipline his employees and denied the plaintiff's Administrative Remedy Procedure. In all other respects the defendants' motion to dismiss is DENIED. Further, the court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over any state law claim. Further, the claims against Sgt. Eby are DISMISSED pursuant to Rule 4(m) for failure to serve the defendant.

Baton Rouge, Louisiana, this 6th day of August, 2012.

_________________

JAMES J. BRADY, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA


Summaries of

Stewart v. Cain

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Aug 6, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-403-JJB-SCR (M.D. La. Aug. 6, 2012)
Case details for

Stewart v. Cain

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES STEWART (#111347) v. BURL CAIN, ET AL.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Date published: Aug 6, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-403-JJB-SCR (M.D. La. Aug. 6, 2012)