From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Steward v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Feb 20, 1990
784 S.W.2d 853 (Mo. Ct. App. 1990)

Opinion

No. 56721.

February 20, 1990.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. LOUIS CITY; THOMAS C. MUMMERT, III, JUDGE.

John A. Klosterman, Columbia, for movant-appellant.

William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Breck K. Burgess, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent-respondent.


ORDER


Movant appeals from the denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Steward v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Feb 20, 1990
784 S.W.2d 853 (Mo. Ct. App. 1990)
Case details for

Steward v. State

Case Details

Full title:DONALD STEWARD, MOVANT-APPELLANT, v. STATE OF MISSOURI…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One

Date published: Feb 20, 1990

Citations

784 S.W.2d 853 (Mo. Ct. App. 1990)

Citing Cases

Steward v. Stange

Steward was a juvenile at the time he committed the offenses. His conviction and sentence were affirmed on…

Steward v. Lewis

Steward was a juvenile at the time he committed the offenses. His conviction and sentence were affirmed on…