From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stevez v. Goodwin Univ.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 21, 2021
21 Civ. 6777 (AT) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 21, 2021)

Opinion

21 Civ. 6777 (AT)

12-21-2021

ARTURO STEVEZ, ON BEHALF OF HIMSELF AND ALL OTHER PERSONS SIMILARLY SITUATED, Plaintiff, v. GOODWTN UNIVERSITY, INC., Defendant.


ORDER

ANALISA TORRES United States District Judge

The Court has been advised that all claims asserted herein have been settled in principle. ECF No. 19. The above-entitled action is hereby dismissed and discontinued without costs, and without prejudice to the right to reopen the action within forty-five days of the date of this Order if the settlement is not consummated.

Any application to reopen must be filed within forty-five days of this Order; any application to reopen filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis. Further, if the parties wish for the Court to retain jurisdiction for the purposes of enforcing any settlement agreement, they must submit the settlement agreement to the Court within the same forty-five-day period to be so-ordered by the Court. Per Rule IV(C) of the Court's Individual Practices hi Civil Cases, the Court will not retain jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement unless it is made part of the public record.

Any pending motions are moot. All conferences are vacated. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Stevez v. Goodwin Univ.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 21, 2021
21 Civ. 6777 (AT) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 21, 2021)
Case details for

Stevez v. Goodwin Univ.

Case Details

Full title:ARTURO STEVEZ, ON BEHALF OF HIMSELF AND ALL OTHER PERSONS SIMILARLY…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Dec 21, 2021

Citations

21 Civ. 6777 (AT) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 21, 2021)