From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

STEVENSON v. WAY ET AL

Oregon Supreme Court
Oct 15, 1958
329 P.2d 666 (Or. 1958)

Opinion

Argued September 11, 1958

Affirmed September 17, 1958 Petition for rehearing denied October 15, 1958

Appeal from Circuit Court, Multnomah County, JAMES R. BAIN, Judge.

Albert A. Asbahr, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs was George C. Reinmiller, Portland.

George Van Hoomissen, Deputy District Attorney, Portland, argued the cause for respondents. On the brief were William M. Langley, District Attorney, and C.W. Pecore, Deputy District Attorney, Portland.

Before PERRY, Chief Justice, and LUSK, SLOAN and O'CONNELL, Justices.


AFFIRMED.


Prior to June 1, 1955, plaintiff was employed as a deputy sheriff of Multnomah county. His employment was subject to the provisions of ORS ch 241, which provides civil service status for Multnomah county employes. Section 241.430 of that statute requires that no classified civil service employe shall be discharged without written notice and hearing.

On May 16 and 17, 1955, the then sheriff, Terry D. Schrunk, conducted an informal hearing in his office culminating in an order of discharge dated June 1, 1955. Plaintiff then filed a notice of appeal to the civil service commission. That body conducted a hearing and thereafter remanded the matter to the sheriff with instructions to conduct a hearing as required by statute. The actual effect of this order was a direction to the sheriff to initiate the proceedings de novo.

Plaintiff then filed this proceeding in the circuit court for Multnomah county, seeking a writ of review by that court. The circuit court entered an order quashing the writ and dismissed the cause. Plaintiff appeals. The only purpose that could be served by sustaining plaintiff's contention would be to require the sheriff to conduct a hearing. This has been available to plaintiff at all times since the order of the civil service commission was entered. The plaintiff prevailed before the commission; hence there is nothing to review. The matter requires no further discussion to determine that plaintiff's appeal is without merit.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

STEVENSON v. WAY ET AL

Oregon Supreme Court
Oct 15, 1958
329 P.2d 666 (Or. 1958)
Case details for

STEVENSON v. WAY ET AL

Case Details

Full title:STEVENSON v. WAY ET AL

Court:Oregon Supreme Court

Date published: Oct 15, 1958

Citations

329 P.2d 666 (Or. 1958)
329 P.2d 666