From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stevens v. State

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma
Aug 24, 1927
258 P. 1074 (Okla. Crim. App. 1927)

Opinion

No. A-5944.

Opinion Filed August 24, 1927.

(Syllabus.)

Intoxicating Liquors — Sale — Sufficiency of Evidence. In a prosecution for selling intoxicating liquor, the evidence examined, and held sufficient to sustain the conviction.

Appeal from County Court, Adair County; W.A. Scofield, Judge.

Riley Stevens was convicted of selling intoxicating liquor, and he appeals. Affirmed.

Hugh M. Bland, for plaintiff in error.

Smith C. Matson, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.


Plaintiff in error, Riley Stevens, was convicted in the county court of Adair county on an information charging that in said county, April 26, 1925, he did sell intoxicating liquor to Jim Miller, and in accordance with the verdict of the jury he was sentenced to pay a fine of $100 and to be confined in the county jail for 30 days. From the judgment rendered in pursuance of the verdict, he appeals.

An examination of the record discloses that the information is sufficient; that the evidence for the state, which is undisputed, fully supports the allegations of the information.

We find the charge of the court fairly presented the law of the case. No error being apparent, the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

EDWARDS and DAVENPORT, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Stevens v. State

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma
Aug 24, 1927
258 P. 1074 (Okla. Crim. App. 1927)
Case details for

Stevens v. State

Case Details

Full title:RILEY STEVENS v. STATE

Court:Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma

Date published: Aug 24, 1927

Citations

258 P. 1074 (Okla. Crim. App. 1927)
258 P. 1074

Citing Cases

Sykes v. State

In treatment we would first notice other pronouncements by this court before considering the two points…