From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stevens v. Barns

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 25, 2013
No. 2:11-cv-3390 MCE CKD P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 25, 2013)

Opinion

No. 2:11-cv-3390 MCE CKD P

02-25-2013

JAMEL R. STEVENS, Petitioner, v. RON BARNS, Respondent.


ORDER

On January 28, 2013, petitioner filed two motions for record materials pursuant to the California Rules of Court. (Dkt. Nos. 27, 28.) These state court rules do not apply in this federal action. Moreover, in its order dated December 28, 2011, the court stated that an answer filed in this action "shall be accompanied by all transcripts and other documents relevant to the issues presented in the petition." (Dkt. No. 3, citing Rule 5, Fed. R. Governing § 2254 Cases.) Accordingly, shortly after respondent filed an answer (Dkt. No. 15), he lodged numerous documents with the court concerning the underlying conviction in this action. (Dkt. No. 17.) At this time, the court has no reason to believe that respondent's lodged documents do not include all relevant materials.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT both of petitioner's January 28, 2013 motions for record materials (Dkt. Nos. 27, 28) are denied.

____________________________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Stevens v. Barns

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 25, 2013
No. 2:11-cv-3390 MCE CKD P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 25, 2013)
Case details for

Stevens v. Barns

Case Details

Full title:JAMEL R. STEVENS, Petitioner, v. RON BARNS, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Feb 25, 2013

Citations

No. 2:11-cv-3390 MCE CKD P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 25, 2013)