Opinion
CIVIL ACTION NO. 19-0821 SECTION P
09-30-2019
GREG STEVENS v. WILL BARHAM, ET AL.
MAG. JUDGE KAREN L. HAYES
JUDGMENT
The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge having been considered, together with the written objections thereto filed with this Court, and, after a de novo review of the record, finding that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is correct and that judgment as recommended therein is warranted,
IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiff Greg Stevens' claims against the Fifth Judicial District, District Attorney's Office are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as frivolous and for failing to state claims on which relief may be granted.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiff's claims against Assistant District Attorney Will Barham are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as frivolous, for failing to state claims on which relief may be granted, and for seeking monetary relief against a defendant immune from such relief.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiff's request to dismiss his charges is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to Plaintiff's right to pursue habeas corpus relief after he exhausts all available state court remedies.
MONROE, LOUISIANA, this 30th day of September, 2019.
/s/_________
TERRY A. DOUGHTY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE