From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stevens v. Aranas

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Jun 27, 2017
Case No. 2:17-cv-01373-APG-PAL (D. Nev. Jun. 27, 2017)

Opinion

Case No. 2:17-cv-01373-APG-PAL

06-27-2017

THEODORE STEVENS, Plaintiff, v. ROMERO ARANAS et al., Defendants.


ORDER

I. DISCUSSION

On May 12, 2017, Theodore Stevens, a prisoner in the custody of the Nevada Department of Corrections ("NDOC"), submitted a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF No. 1, 1-1). Stevens submitted an application to proceed in forma pauperis in his name. (See ECF No. 1). Stevens also identified himself as the plaintiff in the complaint. (ECF No. 1-1 at 1, 9). However, after reading the complaint, it is clear that Stevens is suing on behalf of inmate Jose Cruz Arizmendi regarding events that happened to Arizmendi. (Id. at 3-6). In fact, Stevens explicitly states that he is "attorney-in-fact by and through power of attorney" and is prosecuting the action "on behalf and in the interest of Arizmendi." (Id. at 6). On May 31, 2017, Arizmendi sent a letter updating his address with the Court and stating that "the person who has [his] case is Stevens vs. Aranas et al., 2:17-cv-1373-APG-PAL." (ECF No. 3 at 1).

Pro se litigants have the right to plead and conduct their own cases personally. See 28 U.S.C. § 1654. However, pro se litigants have no authority to represent anyone other than themselves. See Cato v. United States, 70 F.3d 1103, 1105 n.1 (9th Cir. 1995); C.E. Pope Equity Trust v. United States, 818 F.2d 696, 697 (9th Cir. 1987).

The Court dismisses this case, without prejudice, and directs Arizmendi to file his own application to proceed in forma pauperis and his own complaint if he chooses to pursue his claims. Stevens cannot represent Arizmendi in this action and does not have the authority to sue on Arizmendi's behalf.

II. CONCLUSION

For the foregoing reasons, it is ordered that this case is dismissed in its entirety, without prejudice.

It is further ordered that, if Jose Cruz Arizmendi would like to pursue the claims alleged in the complaint, he may do so by filing his own application to proceed in forma pauperis and his own complaint with this Court.

It is further ordered that the Clerk of the Court will send Jose Cruz Arizmendi the approved form application to proceed in forma pauperis by a prisoner, as well as the document entitled information and instructions for filing an in forma pauperis application.

Jose Cruz Arizmendi's address is located in ECF No. 3. --------

It is further ordered that the Clerk of the Court will send to Jose Cruz Arizmendi the approved form for filing a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint and instructions for the same and a copy of the complaint (ECF No. 1-1).

It is further ordered that the Clerk of the Court will enter judgment accordingly.

Dated: June 27, 2017.

/s/_________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Stevens v. Aranas

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Jun 27, 2017
Case No. 2:17-cv-01373-APG-PAL (D. Nev. Jun. 27, 2017)
Case details for

Stevens v. Aranas

Case Details

Full title:THEODORE STEVENS, Plaintiff, v. ROMERO ARANAS et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Jun 27, 2017

Citations

Case No. 2:17-cv-01373-APG-PAL (D. Nev. Jun. 27, 2017)